Welcome to Warhammer 40k - Lexicanum! Log in and join the community.
Difference between revisions of "Talk:Amberley Vail"
From Warhammer 40k - Lexicanum
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
:Done. --[[User:Inquisitor S.|Inquisitor S.]] 18:10, 29 July 2006 (CEST) | :Done. --[[User:Inquisitor S.|Inquisitor S.]] 18:10, 29 July 2006 (CEST) | ||
+ | |||
+ | I didn't realize I put "sexual links" in the article and I would argue the validity. It Might have been another editor as I am the original Author of the article. I thank you however for saving this page. -[[User:ShadowV|ShadowV]], 15 October 2008, 20:44 (MST) |
Revision as of 02:45, 16 October 2008
I don't know how correct this is... but the sexual link in this article shows only that the writer is pretty immature. Removed it. Same goes for the Amberly_Vail article which Orky already emptied, can it be removed?. -- JoeneB, 29 July 2006, 17:00 (CEST)
- Done. --Inquisitor S. 18:10, 29 July 2006 (CEST)
I didn't realize I put "sexual links" in the article and I would argue the validity. It Might have been another editor as I am the original Author of the article. I thank you however for saving this page. -ShadowV, 15 October 2008, 20:44 (MST)