Welcome to Warhammer 40k - Lexicanum! Log in and join the community.

Difference between revisions of "Talk:Necron"

From Warhammer 40k - Lexicanum
Jump to: navigation, search
(2nd Edition Codex)
Line 13: Line 13:
  
 
:That is obviously wrong, as you say there never was a codex for them in 2nd edition. Source removed. --[[User:Inquisitor S.|Inquisitor S., Großmeister des Ordo Lexicanum]] 21:57, 16 April 2010 (UTC)
 
:That is obviously wrong, as you say there never was a codex for them in 2nd edition. Source removed. --[[User:Inquisitor S.|Inquisitor S., Großmeister des Ordo Lexicanum]] 21:57, 16 April 2010 (UTC)
 +
 +
 +
== Contradictory? ==
 +
 +
"but due to the machinations of the Deceiver, this number reduced to four"
 +
 +
" At the precipice of victory, the Enslavers emerged from the now-tumultuous Warp and forced the C'tan and their slaves back with their psychic powers, the weakness of the Star Gods. The Enslavers killed many of the C'tan, leaving the Necrons in disarray and without figureheads to lead them and forcing the C'tan away from the forefront. As the Enslaver plague expanded sections of the galaxy, the four remaining C'tan went into stasis to avoid the onslaught "

Revision as of 18:46, 6 September 2010

The Necrons and the Necrontyr are the same. I don't know why people didn't combine the two, or why there is no organized structure. SanchiTachi 23:22, 28 June 2007 (CEST)

Changed pic size to not overlap text. Jack Lantern 05:06, 25 August 2008 (CEST)

The Necrons and the Necrontyr are not quite the same. The original race of people were the Necrontyr, but the zombie-robots we know of today are Necrons. Cantido 23:17, 26 August 2008 (CEST)

There are still 4 known C'tan, not just two: what about the Void Dragon and the Outsider? OK, one is asleep on Mars and the other insane, and none is playable insofar as I know, but shouldn't they be included nonetheless? Arthfael


2nd Edition Codex

The 2nd Edition Necron Codex is listed as a Source Citation. My understanding is that in 2nd Edition, the Necrons were introduced via articles in White Dwarf, and did not have an official Codex. Is there a way to properly represent this? Alamoth 18:55, 16 April 2010 (UTC)

That is obviously wrong, as you say there never was a codex for them in 2nd edition. Source removed. --Inquisitor S., Großmeister des Ordo Lexicanum 21:57, 16 April 2010 (UTC)


Contradictory?

"but due to the machinations of the Deceiver, this number reduced to four"

" At the precipice of victory, the Enslavers emerged from the now-tumultuous Warp and forced the C'tan and their slaves back with their psychic powers, the weakness of the Star Gods. The Enslavers killed many of the C'tan, leaving the Necrons in disarray and without figureheads to lead them and forcing the C'tan away from the forefront. As the Enslaver plague expanded sections of the galaxy, the four remaining C'tan went into stasis to avoid the onslaught "