Welcome to Warhammer 40k - Lexicanum! Log in and join the community.

Warhammer 40k - Lexicanum:Deletion candidates

From Warhammer 40k - Lexicanum
Revision as of 02:07, 1 October 2008 by ShadowV (talk | contribs) (Articles that should be restored)
Jump to: navigation, search

This is the place to list articles and discuss that should be deleted or restored. Discussions are sorted by date. A list of what's suggested for deletion can be found here Category:Lexicanum deletion candidates.

If you want to suggest that an article should be deleted, plase read the Deletion Rules. A list of deleted articles can be found under Deletion Log.

If you want to suggest that a deleted article should be restored please file it in under "Articles that should be restored" on this page.

Every suggestion has to be signed with ~~~~.

See Lexicanum:Deletion Candidates/Unresolved for other discussions on deletions

Deletion Candidates

  • Please delete The Illuminati. An well-intended user created this article, which is in fact a duplicate of Illuminati. If someone is willing he can transfer worthy information towards the second article. Irulan 20:16, 27 March 2008 (CET)
Basically you're asking for a merge? --Madness 11:21, 26 April 2008 (CEST)
Yep. Irulan 21:40, 1 May 2008 (CEST)
In such a case I would advise replacing the content with a redirect instead of deleting it. --Inquisitor S. 01:40, 3 May 2008 (CEST)
  • Please delete the Fleshborer beetle article as all of the information within it is better represented in the main Fleshborer page and having two articles on a weapon and then its ammunition seems kinda silly to me. Splicers 17:58, 10 June 2008 (CEST)
  • The article *Librarian* seems to me at least to be a fanfic. There are many "cannonless" points that are stated as fact. If the fanfic cannot be removed I suggest a complete deletion and a new article to be created.--Dagon 07:18, 24 August 2008 (CEST)
Do you mean Librarian?--Jonru 11:06, 24 August 2008 (CEST)
Yes. Thanks, I have edited it for spelling.--Dagon 04:54, 25 August 2008 (CEST)

Articles that should be restored

Amberly Vail needs to be restored. She is a very important character and a official inquisitor of the Ordos Xenos. I know I wrote the article, but there is no need to delete this article.

Thagra IV, the planet actually DOES exist, some expansion is needed, google finds a load of links about that, should be mentioned in Eisenhorn novels, I don't know.--Madness 20:28, 20 May 2008 (CEST)

Is mentioned in the main rule-/sourcebook for the game Inquisitor in the description on background for the Mutant Quovandius. Have cited the article by now --Dorle 08:41, 23 June 2008 (CEST)

May i ask why the urdeshi 7th storm troops is up for deletion. they are not user created they are in the book "the guns of tanith" and also they are mentioned on this site as a IG regiment also. I know there is not anough information on them but there is anought to get an idea of them. -- scotzmen 14:47 23 august 2008

Okay, then add the source (and category) and avoid anything like the doctrines to use them.--Genestealer, Magus 16:14, 23 August 2008 (CEST)