Welcome to Warhammer 40k - Lexicanum! Log in and join the community.

Talk:Chainsword

From Warhammer 40k - Lexicanum
Jump to: navigation, search

....Mad Chainsaw Johnson....

As much as I would love for him to acually exist, does anyone have a clue as to weather or not this is actuall cannon? Duffs101 06:12, 27 November 2008 (CET)

Depends on how you define canon of course, but he's in an official GW publication (WD (UK) #93). --Inquisitor S., Großmeister des Ordo Lexicanum 11:32, 27 November 2008 (CET)

Fair nuff, I just hadn't heard of him before and he didn't sound like the 'typical' GW style of character. Thanks for clearing it up. Duffs101 23:29, 27 November 2008 (CET)

Messy references? I see numbers on the below list, but I don't see them infra-text. So I put Rogue Trader as 7th place, but was it wise to do so? --Jacob Sterlov 03:08, 13 February 2011 (UTC)

I think The image of the Hydraphur pattern chainsword is actually an eldar chainsword.--Drakemander (talk) 10:30, 12 June 2022 (UTC)

Well, at least it *does* have a source... Somebody check it? --Inquisitor S., Großmeister des Ordo Lexicanum (talk)
Weeeeell. Basically it could be really Eldar sword. The picture is located inbetween articles, like in the screenshot presented. But as of the later subject in the next page - 'Dark Eldar Scissorhands' the picture of Scissorhands is also located ABOVE its name. So its really Eldar chainsword in the picture that stated as 'Hydraphur' in article, imho. See attached pictures.--Darkelf77 (talk) 17:54, 19 June 2022 (UTC)
Gallery
Sample 1
Sample 2
Difficult to say with any certainty where the image belongs. But it doesn't fit with the description "short-bladed curved chainswords". As it neither looks very short nor very curved. So I think we can all agree then that there is no clear proof that it actually is a Hydraphur pattern chainsword. So out it goes. --Inquisitor S., Großmeister des Ordo Lexicanum (talk) 19:53, 21 June 2022 (UTC)