Talk:Warhammer 40,000: Dawn of War - Dark Crusade

Ahh... are we meant to give strategy tips here? Th232 13:45, 18 September 2007 (CEST)

Not really. If somebody wants to do a strategy guide, I'm sure we could define that as some kind of project page in the Lex, but in the normal article it's misplaced. ---Inquisitor S. 23:19, 18 September 2007 (CEST)

Done. One other question, just took a look at the BL books, those don't need sources because they're their own sources, I take it that Dawn of War&c would fall under the same category? Th232 13:05, 21 September 2007 (CEST)

Well you could distinguish between handbook and the game itself? --Inquisitor S. 17:34, 21 September 2007 (CEST)

Unsure as to how I could do that, since the stuff on the page is ingame features, which are also mentioned in the handbook, so it really comes from both. I also think that I've seen this before. Th232 11:48, 22 September 2007 (CEST)

Messy article.

I suggest a copypaste from wikipedia with updated links to our content. This page holds no information that isn't shown on wikipedia:Warhammer 40,000: Dawn of War: Dark Crusade--Madness 14:31, 2 June 2008 (CEST)

Would you still consider this article messy? if so i could give it a re-do, im a big fan of the game --Endeavour 12:12, 22 July 2008 (CEST)

So would I. Dawn of War mentions the new units in DC, but... this page... doesn't... --Rye 15:05, 24 July 2008 (CEST)

I'll give it a makeover sometime soon, seeing as I've already spit and polished Soulstorm, more or less. --Rye 04:28, 30 August 2008 (CEST)