User talk:Wilsonsuperior
From Lexicanum
If anyone would like to leave a message to me feel free to jot it down here.
(Not that i think anyone would.)
Contents |
Greetings
Greetings :) There is only one major rule here, don't post anything which could get us in trouble :P That's basically rules (i.e. stats, points costs etc.) or directly copy information and post it here (word for word the same). Otherwise anything else is fine. Obviously good manors and no edit wars are also requested :) What you have done on the firewarrior article so far is excellent. Oh and it doesn't really matter how much you do, it's the quality that counts :) Thanks --Jonru 21:14, 21 August 2007 (CEST)
Hi! Hope you're enjoying yourself working on the lex. I just wanted to explain why I changed something back that you edited. In the Mournival article, the sources are lin the order information from them appears in the body of the article. When the order of the sources was changed to reflect the order they were published in, this made the numbering in the article no longer point to the correct source. There's probably a better way for the article to be cited, but I've changed it back for the moment so that it retains logical consistency. Sorry if I interrupted a planned rewrite on the article or anything! Cheers, --Mob 15:02, 22 August 2007 (CEST)
Reason for people getting banned
The "users" that got recently banned were either spambots or people behaving like spambots (unprobable). User will be banned on the following reasons:
- spamming (Viagra etc etc)
- vandalism of articles
- indecent behaviour after having been warned
- racism etc
- on their own request because they don't want to contribute to the project any more, but that's not really banned but "removed"
If there should have been a mistake =me mistaking a real user for a spambot because of the recent flood of spambots, this would have been an accident and can be reverted. Greetz --Inquisitor S. 02:32, 23 August 2007 (CEST)
Those Numbers
They are the number of characters added or taken away in the edit :) Cheers --Jonru 12:05, 24 August 2007 (CEST)
Hello!
Cool, thanks!
The reason none are modern Military Calibres is that the Lee and the Mauser only come in those calibres, well, a few Lee Enfield No.4s were changed to 7.62x51 in the sixties, but good luck getting your hands on one. .22RF is a really cheap targer plinker, cheap as chips, and the .270" is me Dad's "Kill all" button. The other reason is that .243" is a better deer stalking round than 7.62, and 5.56 is less than .240" (6.1mm), so can't be used for stalking. Heh, 12 Bore shotgun shells are military rounds, but only under certian curcumstances. Also, haven't heard of 8.59, I'll have to Wiki it at some point.
Guns are great! Fun for all the familly!
What makes me fanaitic about guard? I guess I don't really know. I suppose it's assocation. Plus the fact that the tanks kick all shades of arse. The infantry isn't bad. It isn't good, but the stat line is better than Tau (With excetion to Armour)Firewarriors. Plus I also have an Uplifting Primer. Costed a bit more than it probably should, and if I remember right, of limited print, but I find it rib-splittingly funny and I can't take other races seriously anymore. Spending 150+ quid on an army, paints and countless hours painting helps :P Regards, --Jack 1st June '08
Addition
Aaah, I would have a .338L, but all the ranges I go to have it on their "Squeaky" list, meaning that it can't be fired, but not for sake of velocity, but noise. :P Heh, Lee Enfield is better, it greater range, accuracy, not more stopping power, but who cares? A trained soldier could fire off about 40 rounds a minute, accuratly! Known as the Mad Minute. If you want my MSN, just ask. It seems we have a lot in common. Regards --Jack
Stubbers
You seem to be the kind of guy who's into that deal, please have a look on Talk:Stubber and help us improving the lex. :D --Madness 14:24, 2 June 2008 (CEST)
Hi
Hey mate, yeah I read it last week. Did you like it?--Mob 20:51, 20 July 2008 (CEST)
Dunno if you've finished it yet, but well, yes, the entire book is just about them trying to blow up the Abyss.--Mob 21:12, 24 July 2008 (CEST)
]|[ S.
I suppose you'll get your answers (okay, answer ;)) faster if you contact him in the german lex (here). Just log in - you can use your account+password for all six lexicani.--Genestealer, Magus 22:46, 22 July 2008 (CEST)
- You can ask him "auf Englisch" ;) - there's also a forum (here - mainly in English) for major problems and questions (but I think in this case It'd be better to contact him directly). About my activities: I'm mostly at the German Lex, sometimes at the English (long ago that I've written articles here - maybe I'll do something more in the future... better then do something like this guy in the french lexicani...).--Genestealer, Magus 23:53, 22 July 2008 (CEST)
- Well I actually try to have a look regularly here ;) @Nationality: yes @User name change: don't know, until now I haven't found an option for that. --Inquisitor S., Großmeister des Ordo Lexicanum 15:04, 27 July 2008 (CEST)
Greetings
Hello! I'd like to first off apologise for not responding. I've been on holiday for the last week but forgot to tell anyone! From what I've seen so far, what you have done fits excellently with the guidelines of the site as well as looking good! I'll continue to investigate and see if there is anything I think you need to alter, but at the moment everything seems great! Thanks for your contributions :) --Jonru 11:28, 23 July 2008 (CEST)
Redirects
They are really simple :) Type the word #redirect and then type where you want to direct it to with normal internal linking brackets, an example is: #redirect [[Great Crusade]] Hope that helps!--Jonru 17:59, 24 July 2008 (CEST)
Help Stuff
Hey, glad you like the redirect help. If you can think of any ways in which you think they could be improved, be it style or content, then please give me a shout. I'm always up for some feedback on my work :)--Jonru 00:05, 25 July 2008 (CEST)
Renaming
I'm afraid i'm not going to be much help. I don't know how to get a new name for you, but i'll have a look and ask those with more knowledge. Sorry!--Jonru 11:03, 25 July 2008 (CEST)
- Er... it's possible to create a new account and let the sysops delete your old - of course, then the list of your contributions is gone by the wind, but you could set a notice (TUFKAWS - The User Formerly Known As WilsonSuperior) on your new user site ;).--Genestealer, Magus 20:14, 25 July 2008 (CEST)
