Welcome to Warhammer 40k - Lexicanum! Log in and join the community.
Difference between revisions of "Category talk:Adeptus Sororitas"
From Warhammer 40k - Lexicanum
Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
Please post your research then. It says clearly here from a White Dwarf Article that it is called the Adepta.. http://www.criticalhit.co.uk/w40krp/wd211_sisters_of_battle.shtml | Please post your research then. It says clearly here from a White Dwarf Article that it is called the Adepta.. http://www.criticalhit.co.uk/w40krp/wd211_sisters_of_battle.shtml | ||
+ | |||
+ | I checked Codex: Witch Hunters (which I would consider the most official source for Sisters of Battle), and it ''is'' the Adept'''a''' Sororitas. Being that it's an all-female organization, it makes sense to use the feminine form of the noun (even though it's all just pidgin Latin anyway). --[[User:AvengingDentist|Avenging Dentist]] 21:27, 23 Jun 2005 (CEST) |
Revision as of 19:27, 23 June 2005
Its not called Adeptus but Adepta.
- It IS called Adeptus, like every other organisation. Just checked that. --Inquisitor S. 19:49, 23 Jun 2005 (CEST)
Please post your research then. It says clearly here from a White Dwarf Article that it is called the Adepta.. http://www.criticalhit.co.uk/w40krp/wd211_sisters_of_battle.shtml
I checked Codex: Witch Hunters (which I would consider the most official source for Sisters of Battle), and it is the Adepta Sororitas. Being that it's an all-female organization, it makes sense to use the feminine form of the noun (even though it's all just pidgin Latin anyway). --Avenging Dentist 21:27, 23 Jun 2005 (CEST)