Welcome to Warhammer 40k - Lexicanum! Log in and join the community.
Difference between revisions of "Talk:Codex: Catachans (4th Edition)"
From Warhammer 40k - Lexicanum
m |
m |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Does stuff like this http://uk.games-workshop.com/imperialguard/catachan-rules/1/ "count" as a codex? --[[User:Madness|Madness]] 11:25, 11 May 2008 (CEST) | Does stuff like this http://uk.games-workshop.com/imperialguard/catachan-rules/1/ "count" as a codex? --[[User:Madness|Madness]] 11:25, 11 May 2008 (CEST) | ||
| − | :Well, it is an official product. There is also the [[Codex: Blood Angels (4th Edition)]]. Yes, I think it counts. [[User:Irulan|Irulan]] 15:12, 11 May 2008 (CEST) | + | :Well, it is an official product. There is also the [[Codex: Blood Angels (4th Edition)]]. Yes, I think it counts. Hey, I'm not sure at all if the Catachan codex belongs to the 4th edition at all. Looking at the Eagle on the cover it seems to be rather to the 3.5 Editon (the 3rd revised Edition). [[User:Irulan|Irulan]] 15:12, 11 May 2008 (CEST) |
Revision as of 13:28, 11 May 2008
Does stuff like this http://uk.games-workshop.com/imperialguard/catachan-rules/1/ "count" as a codex? --Madness 11:25, 11 May 2008 (CEST)
- Well, it is an official product. There is also the Codex: Blood Angels (4th Edition). Yes, I think it counts. Hey, I'm not sure at all if the Catachan codex belongs to the 4th edition at all. Looking at the Eagle on the cover it seems to be rather to the 3.5 Editon (the 3rd revised Edition). Irulan 15:12, 11 May 2008 (CEST)
