Welcome to Warhammer 40k - Lexicanum! Log in and join the community.
Difference between revisions of "Talk:Despoiler Battleship"
From Warhammer 40k - Lexicanum
LegacyCWAL (talk | contribs) |
|||
| Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
--[[User:Hari|Hari]] 16:48, 3 January 2011 (UTC) | --[[User:Hari|Hari]] 16:48, 3 January 2011 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | :There being a fourth Despoiler-class ship is probably the least of the contradictions involving the ''Sword of Sacrilege''. However, since I don't have Index Astartes II, I'll keep quiet regarding ways that the contradictions might be resolved. --[[User:LegacyCWAL|LegacyCWAL]] 17:10, 3 January 2011 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 17:10, 3 January 2011
- 4 ships when only 3 were ever finished?? something isn't righ....
--Hari 16:48, 3 January 2011 (UTC)Hari
- Please sign "talk" contributions by either typing --~~~~ or using the fifth button in the edit menu. And for the number difference one would have to check Index Astartes II under "Rogal Dorn". And then of course there's the fact that GW was never any good with numbers. --Inquisitor S., Großmeister des Ordo Lexicanum 14:03, 3 January 2011 (UTC)
I will try to find the source to check the numbers, but it just seems wrong written in that way, some "it seems only 3 were ever finished" add a little more of sense to the whole. And open the door to a Despoiler "made in Eye of Terror" custom works...
Sorry for the sign issue =)
--Hari 16:48, 3 January 2011 (UTC)
- There being a fourth Despoiler-class ship is probably the least of the contradictions involving the Sword of Sacrilege. However, since I don't have Index Astartes II, I'll keep quiet regarding ways that the contradictions might be resolved. --LegacyCWAL 17:10, 3 January 2011 (UTC)
