Welcome to Warhammer 40k - Lexicanum! Log in and join the community.
Difference between revisions of "Talk:Ian Watson"
From Warhammer 40k - Lexicanum
(POV removed) |
(Many mistakes in it...) |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
"Sordid career" just because he wrote a few Erotic novels? Better to say "diverse career", since we are not judging the man, nor his work. By the way, is Lexicanum supposed to be NPOV like Wikipedia? ;-) --[[User:Jacob Sterlov|Jacob Sterlov]] 02:21, 15 February 2011 (UTC) | "Sordid career" just because he wrote a few Erotic novels? Better to say "diverse career", since we are not judging the man, nor his work. By the way, is Lexicanum supposed to be NPOV like Wikipedia? ;-) --[[User:Jacob Sterlov|Jacob Sterlov]] 02:21, 15 February 2011 (UTC) | ||
+ | :'''Update to my previous comment:''' of course this article should be rewrited. Anyway, during the few time I worked on this stub, I managed to: | ||
+ | :* Rewrite the whole list of his novels, putting Warhammer novels first because are of main concern for the reader. However the whole list is ''unsourced''... can I use Wikipedia as a source? | ||
+ | :* Deal with the ''Orgasmachine'' debate. The author who wrote such an article was totally wrong: wrong about it being a new novel (it was conceived and published in 1976), wrong about its publication being denied in any country except Japan. So I removed the whole Point-of-view commentary. | ||
+ | :At least, now I hope the article is readable. --[[User:Jacob Sterlov|Jacob Sterlov]] 02:43, 15 February 2011 (UTC) |
Revision as of 02:43, 15 February 2011
"Sordid career" just because he wrote a few Erotic novels? Better to say "diverse career", since we are not judging the man, nor his work. By the way, is Lexicanum supposed to be NPOV like Wikipedia? ;-) --Jacob Sterlov 02:21, 15 February 2011 (UTC)
- Update to my previous comment: of course this article should be rewrited. Anyway, during the few time I worked on this stub, I managed to:
- Rewrite the whole list of his novels, putting Warhammer novels first because are of main concern for the reader. However the whole list is unsourced... can I use Wikipedia as a source?
- Deal with the Orgasmachine debate. The author who wrote such an article was totally wrong: wrong about it being a new novel (it was conceived and published in 1976), wrong about its publication being denied in any country except Japan. So I removed the whole Point-of-view commentary.
- At least, now I hope the article is readable. --Jacob Sterlov 02:43, 15 February 2011 (UTC)