Welcome to Warhammer 40k - Lexicanum! Log in and join the community.

Difference between revisions of "Talk:Ian Watson"

From Warhammer 40k - Lexicanum
Jump to: navigation, search
(POV removed)
 
(Many mistakes in it...)
Line 1: Line 1:
 
"Sordid career" just because he wrote a few Erotic novels? Better to say "diverse career", since we are not judging the man, nor his work. By the way, is Lexicanum supposed to be NPOV like Wikipedia? ;-) --[[User:Jacob Sterlov|Jacob Sterlov]] 02:21, 15 February 2011 (UTC)
 
"Sordid career" just because he wrote a few Erotic novels? Better to say "diverse career", since we are not judging the man, nor his work. By the way, is Lexicanum supposed to be NPOV like Wikipedia? ;-) --[[User:Jacob Sterlov|Jacob Sterlov]] 02:21, 15 February 2011 (UTC)
 +
:'''Update to my previous comment:''' of course this article should be rewrited. Anyway, during the few time I worked on this stub, I managed to:
 +
:* Rewrite the whole list of his novels, putting Warhammer novels first because are of main concern for the reader. However the whole list is ''unsourced''... can I use Wikipedia as a source?
 +
:* Deal with the ''Orgasmachine'' debate. The author who wrote such an article was totally wrong: wrong about it being a new novel (it was conceived and published in 1976), wrong about its publication being denied in any country except Japan. So I removed the whole Point-of-view commentary.
 +
:At least, now I hope the article is readable. --[[User:Jacob Sterlov|Jacob Sterlov]] 02:43, 15 February 2011 (UTC)

Revision as of 02:43, 15 February 2011

"Sordid career" just because he wrote a few Erotic novels? Better to say "diverse career", since we are not judging the man, nor his work. By the way, is Lexicanum supposed to be NPOV like Wikipedia? ;-) --Jacob Sterlov 02:21, 15 February 2011 (UTC)

Update to my previous comment: of course this article should be rewrited. Anyway, during the few time I worked on this stub, I managed to:
  • Rewrite the whole list of his novels, putting Warhammer novels first because are of main concern for the reader. However the whole list is unsourced... can I use Wikipedia as a source?
  • Deal with the Orgasmachine debate. The author who wrote such an article was totally wrong: wrong about it being a new novel (it was conceived and published in 1976), wrong about its publication being denied in any country except Japan. So I removed the whole Point-of-view commentary.
At least, now I hope the article is readable. --Jacob Sterlov 02:43, 15 February 2011 (UTC)