Welcome to Warhammer 40k - Lexicanum! Log in and join the community.
Difference between revisions of "Talk:The Death of Uriel Ventris (Short Story)"
From Warhammer 40k - Lexicanum
(Unreasonable.) |
(→Source) |
||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
::So e-bay is considered a reliable source now? [[User:Bobmath|Bobmath]] ([[User talk:Bobmath|talk]]) 10:29, 25 June 2019 (MDT) | ::So e-bay is considered a reliable source now? [[User:Bobmath|Bobmath]] ([[User talk:Bobmath|talk]]) 10:29, 25 June 2019 (MDT) | ||
:::If you look at the image, you can see it is the back cover of the hardcopy source. This physical book doesn't have a digital analogue nor does it appear on the BL site because it's an event exclusive. The goodreads.com page for this book is sorely lacking, thus, the image linked to substantiates the citation of the source provided. Put plainly: Image shows these short stories appear in this physical publication, thus this physical publication is a valid source for these short stories. You are being unreasonable. [[User:GrumpyDilettante|GrumpyDilettante]] ([[User talk:GrumpyDilettante|talk]]) 10:44, 25 June 2019 (MDT) | :::If you look at the image, you can see it is the back cover of the hardcopy source. This physical book doesn't have a digital analogue nor does it appear on the BL site because it's an event exclusive. The goodreads.com page for this book is sorely lacking, thus, the image linked to substantiates the citation of the source provided. Put plainly: Image shows these short stories appear in this physical publication, thus this physical publication is a valid source for these short stories. You are being unreasonable. [[User:GrumpyDilettante|GrumpyDilettante]] ([[User talk:GrumpyDilettante|talk]]) 10:44, 25 June 2019 (MDT) | ||
| + | ::::It's [[User talk:Inquisitor S.#Steel Confessors|established Lexicanum policy]] that physical copies of event-specific published material are not considered reliable sources. Take it up with the Inquisitor, it's not my decision. [[User:Bobmath|Bobmath]] ([[User talk:Bobmath|talk]]) 11:13, 25 June 2019 (MDT) | ||
Revision as of 17:13, 25 June 2019
Source
What's the policy on unsourced material, again? Bobmath (talk) 08:20, 25 June 2019 (MDT)
- I Fixed it. GrumpyDilettante (talk) 09:21, 25 June 2019 (MDT)
- So e-bay is considered a reliable source now? Bobmath (talk) 10:29, 25 June 2019 (MDT)
- If you look at the image, you can see it is the back cover of the hardcopy source. This physical book doesn't have a digital analogue nor does it appear on the BL site because it's an event exclusive. The goodreads.com page for this book is sorely lacking, thus, the image linked to substantiates the citation of the source provided. Put plainly: Image shows these short stories appear in this physical publication, thus this physical publication is a valid source for these short stories. You are being unreasonable. GrumpyDilettante (talk) 10:44, 25 June 2019 (MDT)
- It's established Lexicanum policy that physical copies of event-specific published material are not considered reliable sources. Take it up with the Inquisitor, it's not my decision. Bobmath (talk) 11:13, 25 June 2019 (MDT)
- If you look at the image, you can see it is the back cover of the hardcopy source. This physical book doesn't have a digital analogue nor does it appear on the BL site because it's an event exclusive. The goodreads.com page for this book is sorely lacking, thus, the image linked to substantiates the citation of the source provided. Put plainly: Image shows these short stories appear in this physical publication, thus this physical publication is a valid source for these short stories. You are being unreasonable. GrumpyDilettante (talk) 10:44, 25 June 2019 (MDT)
- So e-bay is considered a reliable source now? Bobmath (talk) 10:29, 25 June 2019 (MDT)
