Talk:Yarant

I can't say where, but I am pretty sure that Yarant is also mentioned already in 2nd ed 40K or early Epic. --Inquisitor S., Großmeister des Ordo Lexicanum (talk) 07:50, 25 April 2020 (UTC)

Now it is a question if it the same 'Yarant' as 'Yarant III' described in this article. Anyway we will need to investigate it and possibly rename this article or something.--Darkelf77 (talk) 08:04, 25 April 2020 (UTC)

We cannot presume a priori that Yarant and Yarant III are the same. As a sidenote there also seems to be a Yarant I and IV. --Inquisitor S., Großmeister des Ordo Lexicanum (talk) 18:52, 25 April 2020 (UTC)

In this case we can because in 'Weregeld (Novella)' it named as 'Yarant Three' and after two paragraphs - just as 'Yarant'. That's why in one of the previous edits https://wh40k.lexicanum.com/mediawiki/index.php?title=Yarant&diff=379167&oldid=323190 there were both this names in article.--Darkelf77 (talk) 19:18, 25 April 2020 (UTC)

From a logical point of view "Yarant" would designate the star system while the numbered Yarants would be the planets in the system. Unfortunately with GW we cannot assume such logic. So Corax might refer to the star system, but we don't know. But you are right that this text scrap says that at least Yarant III and Yarant are geographically close together. It does however not represent proof that Yarant III is Yarant. It could also mean that - as said before - it is the system, where Yarant III is located. Leman Russ would then still be "at Yarant". --Inquisitor S., Großmeister des Ordo Lexicanum (talk) 19:27, 25 April 2020 (UTC)

Well yes - I agree, they (GW) sometimes means system in such cases.--Darkelf77 (talk) 19:50, 25 April 2020 (UTC)