Welcome to Warhammer 40k - Lexicanum! Log in and join the community.

Difference between revisions of "User talk:Inquisitor S."

From Warhammer 40k - Lexicanum
Jump to: navigation, search
m
Line 12: Line 12:
  
 
:::Anyone looked at where the trolling link at the bottom of the page directs to? Hint: Its a good one!--[[User:Ytokes|Ytokes]] 22:40, 13 January 2012 (CET)
 
:::Anyone looked at where the trolling link at the bottom of the page directs to? Hint: Its a good one!--[[User:Ytokes|Ytokes]] 22:40, 13 January 2012 (CET)
 +
 +
== Steel Confessors ==
 +
 +
I agree with your overall move of the claims-to-be-the-pamphlet info to the talk page, but why remove the information cited from the pamphlet which was already on the page? [[User:PDV|PDV]] ([[User talk:PDV|talk]]) 10:21, 22 April 2019 (MDT)

Revision as of 16:21, 22 April 2019

You have to read this

Hy there, it has been a while. My vacations are over and I returned to my edits at the Fantasy Lex. I found this site by pure chance and IMHO you have to read it [1].

The description about you is accurate and funny: The Grand High Marshall of Punishment himself, Inquisitor S., is the most notorious admin on the english Lexicanum. He is equally reviled and feared for his zealous crusade against any users who dare to break the law. Years of bitter warfare with marauding bands of spammers, trolls, and those who are too stupid to actually read the guidelines, have turned his heart into stone. His patience is short and he shoots first and does not ask questions later.

Remember brother Inquisitor: To be just, our law must be cruel. Aehren 04:04, 13 January 2012 (CET)

I am aware of that. And I did not write it myself ;) --Inquisitor S., Großmeister des Ordo Lexicanum 10:50, 13 January 2012 (CET)
I did. The text before that did not match reality by far. --DetlefK 12:07, 13 January 2012 (CET)
Anyone looked at where the trolling link at the bottom of the page directs to? Hint: Its a good one!--Ytokes 22:40, 13 January 2012 (CET)

Steel Confessors

I agree with your overall move of the claims-to-be-the-pamphlet info to the talk page, but why remove the information cited from the pamphlet which was already on the page? PDV (talk) 10:21, 22 April 2019 (MDT)