Welcome to Warhammer 40k - Lexicanum! Log in and join the community.

Difference between revisions of "User talk:Wis"

From Warhammer 40k - Lexicanum
Jump to: navigation, search
Line 7: Line 7:
  
  
Ok is there another way we could communicate at the moment, since were at the moment the only two persons who are making contributions to this wiki?. my msn is [email protected] if you use it.
+
Ok is there another way we could communicate at the moment, since were at the moment the only two persons who are making contributions to this wiki?.
  
 
== Wiki copying ==
 
== Wiki copying ==

Revision as of 21:09, 11 December 2011

Please use this template: http://wh40k.lexicanum.de/wiki/Blood_Angels for the Marine articles --Inquisitor S. 23:57, 13 Jun 2005 (CEST)

Horus Heresy info in Ultramarines

At the moment, I think the Horus Heresy info in the Ultramarines article is pretty much complete. If you add any more Heresy stuff, it should probably go into Horus Heresy instead. Also, I intentionally left out most of the information on the discovery of Roboute Guilliman on Macragge (that'll go in Roboute Guilliman) and the information about the construction of the Fortress of Hera, which will go in Macragge. --Avenging Dentist 00:40, 18 Jun 2005 (CEST)


Ok is there another way we could communicate at the moment, since were at the moment the only two persons who are making contributions to this wiki?.

Wiki copying

I started that other wiki. So a lot of it was written by me. But I didn't see any reason to have two different WH40k wikis, so I migrated the stuff here. I admit that I've copied in all the WH40k stuff from wikipedia, but why reinvent the wheel? It's under the same license (GFDL) so it's better that we have a ground to build from. I'll tro to add more original content from now on though. --Dalen 19:08, 1 Aug 2005 (CEST)


[quote]Could you make so that people have to make a user, before they can add or edit stuff?. Gets confusing with random poeple adding bits of stuff.[/quote] I am sorry, but that is not possible due to the Wiki. However so far we could motivate most people to log in first. If anything written by an anonymous user seems strange, just make a "rollback". --Inquisitor S. 15:38, 2 Aug 2005 (CEST)


I know but still its irritating, if i recall you cant edit anything on wikipedia without making a user.