Welcome to Warhammer 40k - Lexicanum! Log in and join the community.

Difference between revisions of "Warhammer 40k - Lexicanum:Deletion candidates"

From Warhammer 40k - Lexicanum
Jump to: navigation, search
(Just a note)
(Another one)
Line 18: Line 18:
 
*[[List of Imperial Ships]] - completely redundant and the only thing that links to it is "List of Lists" --[[User:LegacyCWAL|LegacyCWAL]] 15:51, 1 December 2010 (UTC)
 
*[[List of Imperial Ships]] - completely redundant and the only thing that links to it is "List of Lists" --[[User:LegacyCWAL|LegacyCWAL]] 15:51, 1 December 2010 (UTC)
 
*[[Dark Eldar Army List]] - Force organization chart. (see [http://forum.lexicanum.com/showthread.php?tid=45 here] for discussion)
 
*[[Dark Eldar Army List]] - Force organization chart. (see [http://forum.lexicanum.com/showthread.php?tid=45 here] for discussion)
 +
*[[Dark Heresy: Inquisitors Handbook]] - Misspelling for [[Dark Heresy: The Inquisitor's Handbook]]. --[[User:Jacob Sterlov|Jacob Sterlov]] 02:14, 21 February 2011 (UTC)
  
 
==Articles That Should Be Restored==
 
==Articles That Should Be Restored==

Revision as of 02:14, 21 February 2011

This is the place to list articles and discuss that should be deleted or restored. Discussions are sorted by date. A list of what's suggested for deletion can be found here Category:Lexicanum deletion candidates.

If you want to suggest that an article should be deleted, plase read the Deletion Rules. A list of deleted articles can be found under Deletion Log.

If you want to suggest that a deleted article should be restored please file it in under "Articles that should be restored" on this page.

Every suggestion has to be signed with ~~~~.

See Lexicanum:Deletion Candidates/Unresolved for other discussions on deletions

Deletion Candidates

I agree with Acidface: it is poorly written and badly sourced. Anyway, shouldn't the main article have a singular title (and not plural)? --Jacob Sterlov 04:22, 15 February 2011 (UTC)

Articles That Should Be Restored