Difference between revisions of "Warhammer 40k - Lexicanum:Deletion candidates"
m (→Deletion Candidates: add) |
(→Deletion Candidates) |
||
Line 29: | Line 29: | ||
::All of these cases are mistakes. Normally we always refer to the single unit, I mean for example we dont name the article Leman Russ Squadron either. --[[User:Inquisitor S.|Inquisitor S., Großmeister des Ordo Lexicanum]] 12:36, 5 October 2011 (CEST) | ::All of these cases are mistakes. Normally we always refer to the single unit, I mean for example we dont name the article Leman Russ Squadron either. --[[User:Inquisitor S.|Inquisitor S., Großmeister des Ordo Lexicanum]] 12:36, 5 October 2011 (CEST) | ||
+ | |||
+ | *[[4th Of July Free Animations]] - Obvious spam. --[[User:Rlyehable|Rlyehable]] 04:33, 25 November 2011 (CET) | ||
==Articles That Should Be Restored== | ==Articles That Should Be Restored== | ||
*[[Cinchare]]- the information on this page is largely incorrect. | *[[Cinchare]]- the information on this page is largely incorrect. |
Revision as of 03:33, 25 November 2011
This is the place to list articles and discuss that should be deleted or restored. Discussions are sorted by date. A list of what's suggested for deletion can be found here Category:Lexicanum deletion candidates.
If you want to suggest that an article should be deleted, plase read the Deletion Rules. A list of deleted articles can be found under Deletion Log.
If you want to suggest that a deleted article should be restored please file it in under "Articles that should be restored" on this page.
Every suggestion has to be signed with ~~~~.
See Lexicanum:Deletion Candidates/Unresolved for other discussions on deletions
Deletion Candidates
- Great Despot of Dregruk - this article is empty accept for a broken redirect--qryan 01:29, 3 November 2011 (CET)
- Close combat weapon - these articles are purely game-mechanics oriented --Acidface 19:16, 27 September 2010 (UTC)
- I agree with Acidface: it is poorly written and badly sourced. Anyway, shouldn't the main article have a singular title (and not plural)? --Jacob Sterlov 04:22, 15 February 2011 (UTC)
- Close Combat Weapons -
- Tau Battleship - nothing links to it and all the info is elsewhere anyway. --LegacyCWAL 17:44, 29 November 2010 (UTC)
- Tau Escorts - similar to above --LegacyCWAL 18:16, 29 November 2010 (UTC)
- List of Imperial Ships - completely redundant and the only thing that links to it is "List of Lists"--LegacyCWAL 15:51, 1 December 2010 (UTC)
- Short Story Anthology Collections - Is made redundant as the page was moved to Anthologies.--Ytokes 07:25, 11 May 2011 (CEST)
- Dark Eldar Army List - Force organization chart. (see here for discussion)
- Lexandro D'Arquebus-Poorly written, not properly sourced.Commisar Gegnillum 13:46, 14 June 2011 (CEST)
- Dragon Claws-Poorly written, information is already present on the Black Dragons page. Commisar Gegnillum 13:46, 14 June 2011 (CEST)
- Dark Eldar Jetbike - Text is exactly the same as in article Reaver Jetbike. In otherhand they also mean the same but Reaver Jetbike article is more on time as representing new codex. Remos 14:58, 18 July 2011
- Raven - Dublicate to Raven Fighter which is more used in Lexicanum. Remos 16:00, 18 July 2011
- Space Marine Scout - the Scout Squad page already exists and is used more often. NTC3 11:38, 5 October 2011 (CEST)
- It does not depend on what is used more often, but what makes more sense. "Space Marine Scout" is the correct title, therefore the content from the Squad page should be moved there. --Inquisitor S., Großmeister des Ordo Lexicanum 12:19, 5 October 2011 (CEST)
Maybe, but there are no Assault Marine or Tactical Marine or Devastator Marine pages, just redirects to the Assault Squad, Devastator Squad and Tactical Squad. It would make more sense to keep in line with these 3 articles and get rid of Space Marine Scout. NTC3 12:34, 5 October 2011 (CEST)
- All of these cases are mistakes. Normally we always refer to the single unit, I mean for example we dont name the article Leman Russ Squadron either. --Inquisitor S., Großmeister des Ordo Lexicanum 12:36, 5 October 2011 (CEST)
- 4th Of July Free Animations - Obvious spam. --Rlyehable 04:33, 25 November 2011 (CET)
Articles That Should Be Restored
- Cinchare- the information on this page is largely incorrect.