Warhammer 40k - Lexicanum:Deletion candidates

Helpful articles

Attention Adept of the LEXICANUM! This article is being created or revised. Please consider this before you edit this text!

Here any Editor can list articles or files that in his/her opinion should be deleted or restored. Do note that an exhaustive list of reasons is expected for either action.

Format

Discussions are sorted by date in reverse chronological order. Items that have been marked with a corresponding template are to be found in the Category:Lexicanum deletion candidates.

Requirements

Editors posting here must have read and understood the Lexicanum Deletion policy.

Deletion candidates

Duplicate image files

The following appear to be duplicate/lower-quality images:

• File:PhalanxGlyphs.jpg (slightly smaller duplicate of File:PhalanxGlyphs2.jpg)
• File:Sohtermiprae2021.jpg (duplicate of File:SOHPraetorCat.jpg)
• File:Tstermipraetor.jpg (duplicate of File:TSPreator.jpg)
• File:Calthcaptain.jpg (duplicate of File:Aethon.jpg)
• File:Tartaros Terminator Squad.jpg (duplicate of File:TartarosSquad.jpg)
• File:Warboss9th2.jpg (duplicate of File:Warboss9thSquig.jpg)
• File:CawdorOrg.jpg (lower quality version of File:FixedCawdorOrg.jpg)
• File:Barakkun.jpg (not exactly a duplicate of File:Barakkun2.jpg given the latter is lower quality, but the former is partially covered by another card)

KazilDarkeye (talk) 18:48, 3 May 2022 (UTC)

• File:Devestator Sergeant with Combi-Grav.JPG (duplicate of File:Data Skull.jpg)

KazilDarkeye (talk) 20:35, 6 May 2022 (UTC)

That file still seems to be in use... --Inquisitor S., Großmeister des Ordo Lexicanum (talk) 20:55, 7 May 2022 (UTC)

Imperial Armour Volume Fourteen – Fires of Cyraxus

Imperial Armour Volume Fourteen – Fires of Cyraxus was announced in 2017, not a word has been heard since, and it was never published. Since then, we got 8th Editions Indexes, and 9th Edition' Compendium covering Imperial Armor content. --Siegfriedfr (talk) 16:24, 11 April 2022 (UTC)

Excertus

Excertus An "Excertus Tank" refers to 'Excertus Imperialis' the Imperial Army, and the text is describing 'an army tank' not a specific type of tank. -- Marginalia 11:45 29 December 2021

Please provide relevant quote for judgement, thanks. --Inquisitor S., Großmeister des Ordo Lexicanum (talk) 20:36, 29 December 2021 (UTC)

Nao'Sak'Oraes Missile Cruiser

Nao'Sak'Oraes Missile Cruiser - this article is based entirely on unofficial material. Needs either moving to unofficial/fanfic section or deleting --Fio'Vre Marky 23:09, 21 July 2013 (UTC

Close combat weapon

• Close combat weapon - these articles are purely game-mechanics oriented --Acidface 19:16, 27 September 2010 (UTC)

I agree with Acidface: it is poorly written and badly sourced. Anyway, shouldn't the main article have a singular title (and not plural)? --Jacob Sterlov 04:22, 15 February 2011 (UTC)

Instead of deletion page has been redirected to Close Combat Weapons (also, some of the game mechaincs related text has been removed from that page). Thelemur 02:18, 21 February 2012 (CET)

Space Marine Scout

Space Marine Scout - the Scout Squad page already exists and is used more often. NTC3 11:38, 5 October 2011 (CEST)

It does not depend on what is used more often, but what makes more sense. "Space Marine Scout" is the correct title, therefore the content from the Squad page should be moved there. --Inquisitor S., Großmeister des Ordo Lexicanum 12:19, 5 October 2011 (CEST)

Maybe, but there are no Assault Marine or Tactical Marine or Devastator Marine pages, just redirects to the Assault Squad, Devastator Squad and Tactical Squad. It would make more sense to keep in line with these 3 articles and get rid of Space Marine Scout. NTC3 12:34, 5 October 2011 (CEST)

All of these cases are mistakes. Normally we always refer to the single unit, I mean for example we dont name the article Leman Russ Squadron either. --Inquisitor S., Großmeister des Ordo Lexicanum 12:36, 5 October 2011 (CEST)

Restoration candidates

• ...
• ...
• ...