Welcome to Warhammer 40k - Lexicanum! Log in and join the community.

Difference between revisions of "Warhammer 40k - Lexicanum talk:Accepted sources"

From Warhammer 40k - Lexicanum
Jump to: navigation, search
(New section: Black Library)
m
(18 intermediate revisions by 8 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
-What is not canon-
+
==Discussions of the ''Help'' article NOT related to the question if a specific source is ''accepted'' or not==
 +
Any discussion of the content of this ''Help'' article not dealing about the status of a specific source goes '''here''':
 +
...
  
I was just wondering what was once considered "canon" and what is now not. Given the rather
+
==Sources requiring a discussion/ ruling==
confusing nature of Warhammer 40,000 canon, I think a clarification of what older stuff
+
Any discussion about the status of a specific source goes '''here''':<br>
is no longer considered canon would help.
 
  
Thank you in advance.[[User:Imperator007|Imperator007]] 03:01, 17 September 2008 (CEST)
+
'''Note:''' Each new ruling request has to be submitted under its own heading, in chronological order! And each request has to be [[Warhammer 40k - Lexicanum:Accepted sources|signed]].
  
== Black Library ==
+
===Example===
 +
Question: Is source ABC published by ABC '''here''' and '''here''' considered an Accepted source? --[[User:Inquisitor S.|Inquisitor S., Großmeister des Ordo Lexicanum]] ([[User talk:Inquisitor S.|talk]]) 08:33, 19 April 2020 (UTC)
  
My understanding as told to me by a close friend and devoted fan of Warhammer is that Black Library is not official, what is published in the novels in not always what happened in the fictional universe.--[[User:LordMilitant|LordMilitant]] 21:03, 26 October 2008 (CET)
+
:Answer: Yes./ No. Because...

Revision as of 08:33, 19 April 2020

Discussions of the Help article NOT related to the question if a specific source is accepted or not

Any discussion of the content of this Help article not dealing about the status of a specific source goes here: ...

Sources requiring a discussion/ ruling

Any discussion about the status of a specific source goes here:

Note: Each new ruling request has to be submitted under its own heading, in chronological order! And each request has to be signed.

Example

Question: Is source ABC published by ABC here and here considered an Accepted source? --Inquisitor S., Großmeister des Ordo Lexicanum (talk) 08:33, 19 April 2020 (UTC)

Answer: Yes./ No. Because...