Talk:Amberley Vail

I don't know how correct this is... but the sexual link in this article shows only that the writer is pretty immature. Removed it. Same goes for the Amberly_Vail article which Orky already emptied, can it be removed?. -- JoeneB, 29 July 2006, 17:00 (CEST)

Done. --Inquisitor S. 18:10, 29 July 2006 (CEST)

I didn't realize I put "sexual links" in the article and I would argue the validity. It Might have been another editor as I am the original Author of the article. I thank you however for saving this page. -ShadowV, 15 October 2008, 20:44 (MST)

If you were the anonymous user who started this article I would begin running ;) If you don't know what I mean check the history. But I suppose that you wanted to write on the talk page of the formlery mispelled "Amberly". --Inquisitor S., Großmeister des Ordo Lexicanum 10:40, 16 October 2008 (CEST)

I'm willing to add some sourcing to this article and others relating to the Ciaphas Cain series as I go through my reread. One question I have is on how granular Lexicanum wants sources to be. Take for example the following passage from the article:

"On Gravalax, Vail disguised herself as a traveling singer hired as entertainment for the Governor's party. After escaping the tunnels of the planet during a more in-depth investigation, she enlisted Cain to dig further into the planet's tunnels (and found out that Cain's aide Jurgen was a blank). The troop found a genestealer cult and eliminated its Patriarch."

This paragraph details story beats from the entirety of For the Emperor, should the location of the various beats be cited after the sentence describing them, should they be cited in a bunch at the end of the paragraph, or would it be enough to cite the book as a whole for this passage, given that it's almost a summary of it? DobbyKroket (talk) 01:06, 11 March 2024 (UTC)