Talk:Forgotten Fleets

Made by an unregistered user, doesn't confirm to guidelines, no sources -- JoeneB, 28 January 2007, 18:42 (CET)

Added {cite} notation to page. The name of this article is also misleading. It should be "Creatures of Forgotten Tyranid Fleets". "Forgotton Fleets" would indicate the article is about lost fleets, not the species they left behind. Information in article sounds correct, but I will have to check my old White Dwarf magazines to be sure. --Rlyehable 11:24, 12 February 2007 (CET)

I can confirm that the name of the article is Forgotten Fleets! I was fascinated to see this on the Tyranid page since I'd never heard of these creatures before. I Googled it and found the article on the Games Workshop official website. It's available to view at uk.games-workshop.com/tyranids/forgotten-fleets/1/ . Does anyone know whether I can cite this as the source or is that against the rules? --newsdeskdan 18:03, 12 February 2007 (GMT)

If it is an actual webpage you can cite it directly, if it is a pdf document you cite the corresponding download-page where one can download that document with the document's name. For example *[http://uk.games-workshop.com/news/errata/3/ Codex: Daemonhunters FAQ 4.0.1]. --Inquisitor S. 19:30, 12 February 2007 (CET)

Cool. Thanks Inquisitor S.! --newsdeskdan 18:36, 12 February 2007 (GMT)

I've just read the GW article and compared it to this article and it seems to be an one on one copy of the information of the GW article. This is an infringement of the copyrights and thus this article should be rewritten. Added the "attention adept" tag-- JoeneB, 12 February 2007, 20:37 (CET)

If that's the case this has to be done quite soon, else I'm sorry but it would have to be removed. --Inquisitor S. 21:19, 12 February 2007 (CET)

Just wanted to note that the source link is broken; if another link is found someone needs to replace it. Commisar Gegnillum 15:23, 1 June 2011 (CEST)