Talk:Sensei

Why exactly do we keep that uncited Italian source around? --Inquisitor S., Großmeister des Ordo Lexicanum (talk) 20:52, 15 February 2020 (UTC)

It is a 6th edition Apocalypse campaign that was published by Games Workshop in Italy. It is kept around because it possess some level of credence due to its distribution by GW and because it is the most recent source to make mention of the Sensei. For the most part, it does not contain any new lore, but it does name Sensei who have not found or shy away from their purpose as Ronin. It's no different than allowing things from fanatic magazine to be cited, albeit with a notice. Squirem (talk) 04:18, 16 February 2020 (UTC)

As an aside, it will be some time before the Illuminati and Star Child lore is updated. I'm currently reading through Inquisition War trilogy, and the last book may have been the last official GW/BL publication to allude to the Star Child, Illuminati, and the Sensei. Squirem (talk) 04:24, 16 February 2020 (UTC)

Yes. But the "uncited" section is not there for "further" reading. It is there for editors to see what has been (allegedly) used in the articles but has no footnotes yet. So it is not allowed to actually add sources to "uncited", only to remove once they have been dealt with. Summarized: Either it is used somewhere in the article or it has to go. This could for example even be in a "Note" at the end of the article along the lines that GW last mentioned the Sensei in that source or whatever. But it must be used in order to be listed. --Inquisitor S., Großmeister des Ordo Lexicanum (talk) 12:39, 16 February 2020 (UTC)