Welcome to Warhammer 40k - Lexicanum! Log in and join the community.

Talk:Terminator Armour

From Warhammer 40k - Lexicanum
Jump to: navigation, search

This page needs some Strong pictures to make it more effective... and far more info! Here's some stuff to look at (Bolter&Chainsword): Linky

Novamarine 22:53, 3 April 2008 (CEST)

I'm sure I read in somewhere that terminator armour was actually just a mining suit from dark age of technology and actual combat armors were way more advanced. But it isn't written in here or dark age of technology page. Am I completely wrong? Deranzo (talk) 07:38, 10 November 2023 (UTC)

Patterns of Terminator armour

I'm thinking some information on known variants of Terminator armour may be a good addition, instead of just lumping them all in the Variants section with no further details. We know of three distinct patterns: Indomitus (what you get in the standard Marine/Chaos Marine plastic kits - the FW site and Codex: Space Wolves confirm this name), Tartaros (sold by FW), and Cataphractii (first seen in the Visions artbooks, named as such there, in Know No Fear, and in one of the stories in The Primarchs). I might add it myself soon, but I was just wondering what people think of the idea.--The Warmaster 12:00, 30 April 2012 (CEST)

Note on Mk II and III

Note for further expansion: There is artwork in the 1989 edition of Space Hulk depicting both marks. --Inquisitor S., Großmeister des Ordo Lexicanum (talk) 13:21, 8 May 2019 (MDT)

'Blank' Sources

Why we have a 'blank' sources, - '1', '8', '10' and '21'? If they are not used, the numeration of the sources must be shifted and brought to order by Adept who made this 'changes'.--Darkelf77 (talk) 18:35, 3 October 2023 (UTC)

Probably me. I was getting rid of repeated sources and couldn't be bothered to do the renumbering as well. KazilDarkeye (talk) 19:00, 3 October 2023 (UTC)
We need to remaster it. You, or me, don't matter - who will have time to do it first. Because now it looks like as if the Inquisition had come here, and redacted the article :) --Darkelf77 (talk) 09:34, 4 October 2023 (UTC)
Oh, you've already done it. Thank you!--Darkelf77 (talk) 09:37, 4 October 2023 (UTC)