Page history
15 July 2023
17 August 2022
14 March 2021
14 January 2021
11 October 2020
19 April 2020
→Examples of grey areas requiring evaluation on a case by case basis or specific disclaimers
m+152
→Examples of accepted sources
m+362
no edit summary
m+114
17 April 2020
→What to do in case of conflicting Accepted sources
m-1
→What to do in case of conflicting Accepted sources
m+1
no edit summary
m+609
15 April 2020
Protected "Warhammer 40k - Lexicanum:Accepted sources" ([Edit=Allow only administrators] (indefinite) [Move=Allow only administrators] (indefinite))
mno edit summary
m-8
no edit summary
m+186
→Why the term "Canon" or "Canonicity" is problematic
m+1
no edit summary
m+12
no edit summary
+3
no edit summary
m+4
no edit summary
m+1
no edit summary
mno edit summary
m+15
→Why the term "Canon" or "Canonicity" is problematic
m+388
no edit summary
m+16
→Why the term "Canon" or "Canonicity" is problematic
m+50
→Why the term "Canon" or "Canonicity" is problematic
m+1,181
→Why the term "Canon" or "Canonicity" is problematic
m+2
→Why the term "Canon" or "Canonicity" is problematic
m+894
→Examples of grey areas requiring evaluation on a case by case basis or specific disclaimers
m+38
→Examples of unacceptable sources
m+38
no edit summary
+1,529
→Why the term "Canon" or "Canonicity" is problematic
m-54
→Why the term "Canon" or "Canonicity" is problematic
+9,408
→Why the term "Canon" or "Canonicity" is problematic
m+11,933
→Why the term "Canon" or "Canonicity" is problematic
m+2,812
→Why the term "Canon" or "Canonicity" is problematic
m+19
no edit summary
m+2,287
no edit summary
m+16
→Why the term "Canon" or "Canonicity" is problematic
m+1
beginning of overhaul
m+629
Inquisitor S. moved page Warhammer 40k - Lexicanum:Canon to Warhammer 40k - Lexicanum:Accepted sources: "Canon" is an ill-defined term
m
