Talk:Destroyer (Tank Hunter)

Naming convension

• Why Destroyer (Tank Hunter) and not simply Destroyer (Tank) ?

I didn't find the rule in Lexicanum:Naming Conventions, but by other lexis it is only a 'type'

• • for example: Name (Dark Angel) / Name (Tank) -> and not Name (Rhino) or Name (Rhino Hunter)

• The same question for the Cyclops Demolition Vehicle article.

--Ackheron 09:37, 9 July 2011 (CEST)

It does not realy matter. First the title should be as given in the sources. The rest should be more or less uniform and be fixed with internal redirects. --Inquisitor S., Großmeister des Ordo Lexicanum 09:53, 9 July 2011 (CEST)

I've been asking by the French Lexi to find a more precise rule for the naming convention and especially for this "between brackets" disambiguation case. I think an accuracy on the curent rule in this case could avoid useless controverses in the future for all lexis, and make the work quicker. --Ackheron 21:44, 9 July 2011 (CEST)

Well. In that case there has to be a discussion in the forum. --Inquisitor S., Großmeister des Ordo Lexicanum 23:37, 9 July 2011 (CEST)

On the Forgeworld website (and IA pages 10 + 11), the tank is reffered to as "Destroyer Tank Hunter", shouldnt that be the title with no brackets at all? Thelemur 01:01, 10 July 2011 (CEST)

Controverses: for example.. (thanks Thelemur ; ) See you on the Forum. --Ackheron 07:11, 10 July 2011 (CEST)