Welcome to Warhammer 40k - Lexicanum! Log in and join the community.

User talk:Gunes kuday

From Warhammer 40k - Lexicanum
Jump to: navigation, search

Welcome to Warhammer 40k - Lexicanum! We hope you will contribute much and well. You will probably want to read the [Lexicanum:Help help pages]. Again, welcome and have fun! Inquisitor S., Großmeister des Ordo Lexicanum (talk) 15:18, 15 January 2018 (MST)


Please add categories when you make new articles. -Harriticus

Please add source number to ALL of your paragraphs not only to the last one. -Darkelf77


Please also add footnotes to the information in the table, thanks. --Inquisitor S., Großmeister des Ordo Lexicanum (talk) 02:42, 26 September 2019 (MDT)

Demios Binary

Hi there. On your recent edits you noted that Demios Binary is in the Cadian System, but on the planet's page it lists the system as Demios Binary as well? Is this a case of conflicting sources? KazilDarkeye (talk) 17:49, 17 June 2020 (UTC)


If you type --~~~~ it will be automatically transformed into your timestamped Signature, thanks. --Inquisitor S., Großmeister des Ordo Lexicanum (talk) 16:46, 23 June 2020 (UTC)


Style advice: Please less 40K-ish and more matter of fact. Example: "Cleansing flame, holy bolter fire and blessed incense swept Chaos forces from the ruins of Sabena and three nearby worlds, the zeal of the Adepta Sororitas eclipsing and overtaking the Adeptus Astartes Chapters joined to their cause." --> "The Adepta Sororitas cleaned the ruins of Sabena and three nearby worlds from the Chaos forces. Their zeal was even greater than that of the Adeptus Astartes chapters who also took part in the campaign." Thanks. (And I actually do hope that this text was not a word for word copy from the original source ;)). --Inquisitor S., Großmeister des Ordo Lexicanum (talk) 10:38, 26 June 2020 (UTC)

I didn't know, sorry. It fits the rules now. --Deranzo (talk) 11:07, 26 June 2020 (UTC)


I reverted your additions and here are the corresponding remarks:

  • Sorry, but from the point of view of language/ grammar style this would have required more effort.
  • The pictures you added were added under "Typical variations and examples". And they definitely were not as they are not from any accepted source.
  • You added a "Note 3" and a "Note 4" as footnotes - but there were no instances in the text actually referring to them. So they were orphaned and as such not used as intended.
  • You could maybe add your pictures and some of the text somewhere in Trivia (with also more work on external links and explanations), but only defused by using a much more tenuous and uncertain tone. The Double-headed eagle predates the Seljuks by quite a while so your remarks are just one of many, many, many possible connections - and any trivia section should correspondingly be formulated to reflect that.

Inquisitor S., Großmeister des Ordo Lexicanum (talk) 21:56, 8 December 2021 (UTC)

Alright then. I will just add information to trivia section --Deranzo (talk) 08:47, 9 December 2021 (UTC)Gunes kuday