Welcome to Warhammer 40k - Lexicanum! Log in and join the community.

Warhammer 40k - Lexicanum:Deletion candidates

From Warhammer 40k - Lexicanum
Jump to: navigation, search
Grotwrench.jpg Attention Adept of the LEXICANUM!

This article is being created or revised.
Please consider this before you edit this text!

Here any Editor can list articles or files that in his/her opinion should be deleted or restored. Do note that an exhaustive list of reasons is expected for either action.

Format

Discussions are sorted by date in reverse chronological order. Items that have been marked with a corresponding template are to be found in the Category:Lexicanum deletion candidates.

Requirements

Editors posting here must have read and understood the Lexicanum Deletion policy.

Deletion candidates

I agree with Acidface: it is poorly written and badly sourced. Anyway, shouldn't the main article have a singular title (and not plural)? --Jacob Sterlov 04:22, 15 February 2011 (UTC)
Instead of deletion page has been redirected to Close Combat Weapons (also, some of the game mechaincs related text has been removed from that page). Thelemur 02:18, 21 February 2012 (CET)
It does not depend on what is used more often, but what makes more sense. "Space Marine Scout" is the correct title, therefore the content from the Squad page should be moved there. --Inquisitor S., Großmeister des Ordo Lexicanum 12:19, 5 October 2011 (CEST)
Maybe, but there are no Assault Marine or Tactical Marine or Devastator Marine pages, just redirects to the Assault Squad, Devastator Squad and Tactical Squad. It would make more sense to keep in line with these 3 articles and get rid of Space Marine Scout. NTC3 12:34, 5 October 2011 (CEST)
All of these cases are mistakes. Normally we always refer to the single unit, I mean for example we dont name the article Leman Russ Squadron either. --Inquisitor S., Großmeister des Ordo Lexicanum 12:36, 5 October 2011 (CEST)

Restoration candidates

  • Cinchare- the information on this page is largely incorrect.